No Home Training

"I absolutely was offended."
That's what my Iranian-American friend said about the reception Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad got at the hands of Lee Botinger, the president of Columbia University.
Bollinger called Ahmadinijad a "cruel and petty dictator"-which is almost certainly true, but in this context just looked like a capitulation to all the critics who made it plain they didn't think the Iranian leader should have been invited in the first place.
"You don't invite somebody and then insult him
right to his face," she said.
And she was right. It was just plain rude and I was embarrassed.
Look, Bollinger is obviously a big defender of freedom-of-expression or he wouldn't have invited Ahmadinejad in the first place. All he had to say was something like: "We honor our own beliefs by having you here, and in no way do we endorse yours."
Fair enough. But Bollinger's move was just a cheap shot at a man who came to talk in front of an audience he already knew was very unfriendly.
Not that the audience didn't have good reason. The man is a Holocaust denier, for Godsakes, and has said before he wants Israel wiped off the map. His anti-semitism and autocratic rule deserve no defense. But from where I sit, it is not about his values--its about ours.
Now let me be clear, my friend is no fan of the Iranian leader either. First of all she says he is far too homely to be leader of a country with so many good looking people, but mostly she says he is "crazy."
But apparently not as looney as he sounded to Americans when he appeared to say they don't have gay people in Iran. You see, my friend speaks Farsi, and she says the translator got it wrong. He didn't say Iran has no gay people.
She says what he was trying to convey is there is no gay 'culture' as we have here. No official recognition, no 'gay' rights, no openly gay people in congress...that sort of thing.
I was actually relieved to hear that. Ahmadinejad may be a kook by our standards. But a kook completely out of touch with reality would be immeasurably worse.

3 Comments:
That interests me, about translations. How effectively are statements translated can have immeasurable impact.
I'd counter that the reason no Gay culture exists (that they know of) is because of very harsh penalties. Meaning its there I wager, just very secret.
I also agree it was a bad move to gun him down before he had a chance to speak a word. It only serves to reinforce negative opinion towards a country that celebrates free speech and liberal thinking (this was broadcast internationally).
I haven't had a chance to see it, but I did read about it and the other articles did say the opening barrage was uncalled for.
So I guess he (Botinger) did "cave in" and forsook his better judgement in taste and convention in favor of popular opinion.
It only serves to make us look as bad or as guilty as Ahmadinijad.
I have no Iranian friends, just Pakistan and Palsestine. I've known several Iranians though, and they were all extremely courteous and decent people.
These are the times we live in, what a shame.
Honestly, after reading and even being sucked into dialogue with some of these "people" in these forums (I use the word "people" very loosley), I'm not one bit surprised that Columbia University's president said those things. It's as American as apple pie to spew hate and be protected in doing so. We protect the Klan knowing their history and their ultimate goals. But the Black Panthers were obliterated for bringing protection and help to the Black masses with next to no unneeded force. That pesky issue of hipocracy comes to mind. American business as usual.
WELL, SO TYPICAL OF AMERICAN MEDIA ONE DAY IRAN IS IN ALL THE NEWS WITH IT'S CRAZY PRESIDENT AND THE NEXT DAY ON TO SOMEONE ELSE. AT LEAST IRAN DOES NOT BUILD ITSELF TO BE THE PROTECTOR OF THE WORLD LIKE GEORGE BUSH AND HIS ADMINSTRATION.AS THIS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT IS KILLING THOUSANDS AROUND THE WORLD EVERYDAY, WE ONLY WORRY ABOUT IF IRAN HAS GAY PEOPLE OR NOT.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home